Канада

FAA Aerospace Forecasts: Economic Tables

The focus of this domain is on the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) countries on the southern and eastern shores of the Mediterranean (ENP-South), namely: Algeria (DZ),Egypt (EG),Israel (IL),Jordan (JO),Lebanon (LB),Libya (LY),Morocco (MA),Palestine (PS) (1),Syria (SY) andTunisia (TN). An extensive range of indicators is presented in this domain, including indicators from almost every theme covered by European statistics. Generally, only annual data are published in this domain. The data and their denomination in no way constitute the expression of an opinion by the European Commission on the legal status of a country or territory or on the delimitation of its borders. (1) This designation shall not be construed as recognition of a State of Palestine and is without prejudice to the individual positions of the Member States on this issue.

The indicator shows the volume of goods transported in Europe (in tonnes), broken down by country and by year. The data covers the total volume of freight and mail loaded/unloaded.

Monthly aircraft movements (civil itinerant, civil local, military itinerant, military local) for airports with NAV CANADA towers.

Annual aircraft movements by class of operation (itinerant and local) by rank and number of movements, for airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations.

Monthly aircraft movements (civil itinerant, civil local, military itinerant, military local) for airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations.

Monthly aircraft movements (itinerant and local) by rank, number, peak hour and peak day, for airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations. Aircraft movements, by class of operation and peak hour and peak day of movements, airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations, monthly

Monthly aircraft movements (itinerant and local) by rank, number, peak hour and peak day, for airports with NAV CANADA towers.   Aircraft movements, by class of operation and peak hour and peak day of movements, for airports with NAV CANADA towers, monthly

Defense Aircraft Summary

Monthly itinerant movements (domestic, transborder and international) by type of operation (level I-III and foreign air carriers, level IV-VI, other commercial, private, government civil and government military), for airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations. Domestic and international itinerant movements, by type of operation, airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations, monthly

Monthly itinerant movements (domestic, transborder and international) by type of operation (level I-III and foreign air carriers, level IV-VI, other commercial, private, government civil and government military) for airports with NAV CANADA towers.   Domestic and international Itinerant movements, by type of operation, airports with NAV CANADA towers, monthly

Under the International Aviation Safety Assessment (IASA) program, the FAA determines whether another country's oversight of its air carriers that operate, or seek to operate, into the US, or codeshare with a US air carrier, complies with safety standards established by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The IASA program is administered by the FAA Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety (AVS), Flight Standards Service (AFS), International Programs and Policy Division (AFS-50).   The FAA has established two ratings for the status of countries at the time of the assessment: Does comply with ICAO standards, and Does not comply with ICAO standards. They are defined as follows:Category 1, Does Comply with ICAO Standards:  A country's civil aviation authority has been assessed by FAA inspectors and has been found to license and oversee air carriers in accordance with ICAO aviation safety standards.Category 2, Does Not Comply with ICAO Standards:  The Federal Aviation Administration assessed this country's civil aviation authority (CAA) and determined that it does not provide safety oversight of its air carrier operators in accordance with the minimum safety oversight standards established by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). This rating is applied if one or more of the following deficiencies are identified:the country lacks laws or regulations necessary to support the certification and oversight of air carriers in accordance with minimum international standards;the CAA lacks the technical expertise, resources, and organization to license or oversee air carrier operations;the CAA does not have adequately trained and qualified technical personnel;the CAA does not provide adequate inspector guidance to ensure enforcement of, and compliance with, minimum international standards;  ANDthe CAA has insufficient documentation and records of certification and inadequate continuing oversight and surveillance of air carrier operations. This category consists of two groups of countries.One group are countries that have air carriers with existing operations to the United States at the time of the assessment. While in Category 2 status, carriers from these countries will be permitted to continue operations at current levels under heightened FAA surveillance. Expansion or changes in services to the United States by such carriers are not permitted while in category 2, although new services will be permitted if operated using aircraft wet-leased from a duly authorized and properly supervised U.S. carrier or a foreign air carrier from a category 1 country that is authorized to serve the United States using its own aircraft.The second group are countries that do not have air carriers with existing operations to the United States at the time of the assessment. Carriers from these countries will not be permitted to commence service to the United States while in Category 2 status, although they may conduct services if operated using aircraft wet-leased from a duly authorized and properly supervised US carrier or a foreign air carrier from a Category 1 country that is authorized to serve the United States with its own aircraft. No other difference is made between these two groups of while countries in a category 2 status.   Category 1 and 2 coded as 1 and 0 respectively. Category 1 implies Meets ICAO standards and Category 2 implies Does not meets ICAO standard

Monthly itinerant movements by aircraft weight group, broken down by maximum take-off weight categories ranging from under 2,000 kgs to over 136,000 kgs, for airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations.   Itinerant movements, by aircraft maximum take-off weight, airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations, monthly

Monthly itinerant movements by instrument flight rules (I.F.R.), % of IFR flights, visual flight rules (V.F.R.), % of VFR flights, and runway 88 movements, for airports with NAV CANADA towers.   Itinerant Movements by Instrument Flight Rules, visual flight rules and runway 88, airports with NAV CANADA towers, monthly

Monthly itinerant movements by instrument flight rules (I.F.R.), % of IFR flights, visual flight rules (V.F.R.), % of VFR flights, and runway 88 movements, for airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations.   Itinerant movements, by instrument flight rules, visual flight rules and runway 88, airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations, monthly

Monthly itinerant movements by type of operation (level I-III and foreign air carriers, level IV-VI, other commercial, private, government civil and government military), for airports with NAV CANADA towers.

Monthly itinerant movements by type of operation (level I-III and foreign air carriers, level IV-VI, other commercial, private, government civil and government military) for airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations.

Monthly itinerant movements by type of power plant (jet, turbo-propellers, piston, helicopters and gliders), for airports with NAV CANADA towers.

Monthly itinerant movements by type of power plant (jet, turbo-propellers, piston, helicopters and gliders), for airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations.   Itinerant movements, by type of power plant, airports with NAV CANADA flight service stations, monthly

Monthly itinerant movements by aircraft weight group, broken down by maximum take-off weight categories ranging from under 2,000 kgs to over 136,000 kgs, for airports with NAV CANADA towers. Itinerant movements, by aircraft maximum take-off weight, for airports with NAV CANADA towers, monthly

Monthly operating and financial statistics (number of thousands of: passengers, passenger-kilometres, available seat-kilometres, load factor, hours flown, turbo fuel consumed in litres, and total operating revenues) for major Canadian airlines.

Top Twenty Aerospace Suppliers to the U.S. Customs Value in $ millions (General Imports)

Top Twenty U.S. Aerospace Export Markets F.A.S. Value in $ millions (Total Exports)

Top U.S. Trading Partners for Aerospace and Defense Data cited at:https://www.aia-aerospace.org/

The U.S. defense industry, which is composed of firms that manufacture defense equipment and supply defense-related parts and services, shipped approximately $20 billion worth of exports in 2017, which accounted for 1.3 percent of total U.S. exports for that year. Over the past ten years, U.S. defense exports grew by a considerable 75 percent, or from $11.5 billion in 2007 to $20 billion in 2017, with the largest growth taking place in the industry’s military aerospace subsector. The most recent data also show the U.S. maintaining its position as the world’s largest exporter of defense equipment. In 2016, the U.S. accounted for 32 percent of total global defense exports, followed by Russia (21%), Germany (9%), France (7%), and China (7%). On a geographic basis, the largest destinations for U.S. defense equipment were the Asia-Pacific and the Middle East, which collectively accounted for 62 percent of total defense exports in 2017, or $12.5 billion. Defense exports to the Americas, Africa and Europe accounted for the remaining 38 percent, or $7.5 billion. With regard to content, U.S. defense exports continue to be dominated by aerospace platforms, parts and components, which accounted for nearly 69 percent of total defense exports in 2017, or $13.9 billion, while exports of land systems, sea systems and weapons accounted for the remaining 31 percent, or $6.2 billion.   Data cited at:https://www.aia-aerospace.org/